Precise-weight metal ingots Part I. Part III.
Part IV.
In other words, this commodity ensured a simple transaction and
reduced transaction expenses. Gold bars used as money were circulated in the form of a standard
geometric mass of uniform shape, composition and weight, which was
certified by a special stamp on the bar. The production and branding of
these bars, naturally, was the prerogative of the highest authorities, that
is, sovereigns and high priests. This attests to the fact that they were
sufficiently widely exchanged even in long-distant historical times, and
that eventually exchange developed into regular trade, which dictated
the need for a standard monetary equivalent certified by the higher
authorities.. Such ingots were in circulation in Ancient Babylon between 3000
and 2000 B.C. Small bars of solid-weight gold (about 14g) with the
Pharaoh’s stamp were in circulation in Egypt around 3000 B. C.; bars
without a stamp were worth less, as few people were able to distinguish
gold from a counterfeit, but they trusted the stamp of the Pharaoh. Only
expert craftsmen and masters of the gold industry could forge the Pharaoh’s
stamp at that level of technological development, and each of
these men was well-known. Also, the punishment for such forgery was
extremely severe. It is worth noting that the first promissory component appeared in
this money and, even then, the first demand appeared not for consumer
value, but for exchange value. The exchange value in the gold bars was the ruler’s legal guarantee
of their composition and weight. «In situations when one could only be
certain of the authenticity of metal currency by means of a complicated
testing process, for which the average person was neither qualified
nor equipped, the stamp of a universally recognised government body
could serve as a convincing guarantee of the authenticity of the currency…
The challenge, which the government took upon itself to answer,
initially consisted not so much of producing money as certifying the
weight and quality of the materials being used as money everywhere…
Pieces of metal were seen as money proper only if they had the stamp
of the relevant government body, whose duty it was, as indeed it should
be, to attest to the fact that the money did in fact weigh the prescribed
amount and contain metal of the proper standard, which is what gave
it its value" 105 "The names of some modern currencies hark back to when they were
gold money of precise weight. For example, the English pound sterling
used to be equal in England to one pound of pure silver, in William the
Conqueror’s time. In this form it was not minted, but acted as accounting
money. The pound sterling was divided into twenty parts — shillings,
each of which, in turn, was divided into twelve pence, or pennies. It is
the penny, in fact, that was minted and in those times was the largest
coin (K. Marx). However, in the 13th century, the weight of the English
penny was equal to the weight of 32 wheat grains, «rounded, dried and
taken from the middle of the ear". 106 In 14th century Russia, bars of silver in the form of rounded batons
with deep diametrical grooves, weighing up to 200g (Lithuania), or
batons of triangular cross section weighing 197–200g (Novgorod), or
elongated hexagons weighing about 160g (Kiev), having been given the
name «grivna», were designed mostly for large accounts and payments.
They were used to pay for important trade transactions, indemnities
and monetary investments in monasteries, and to purchase large landed
estates. Novgorod grivnas that were split in half acquired the name «poltina»
(«half»)107. Russian precise-weight ingots had no stamp or, therefore, promissory component, which signifies an extremely low level of development108. Circulation The consumer value of such an entity was equal to the value of the
metal, while the exchange value exceeded it on the scale of the value of
the guarantee marked on the stamped area. In such ingots, a promissory/liability component appeared in addition
to the object component, and this was defined by the dual nature
of this material commodity in the prevalence of the object component.
However, the significance of the promissory component (the Pharaoh’s
guarantee of the composition and weight of the ingot), provided for by
the property of the ruler, his right to collect taxes, to lead aggressive
wars and carry out raids, made owners think about whether it was efficient
to remelt ingots — for then the promissory component was lost
forever, which entailed a significant loss of value. |
Copying information from this website is only allowed under condition of referring to this web link.
Copyright © 2008 Andrey Gribov
All rights reserved