Natural commodity money Part I. Part III.
Part IV.
If we look at the evolution of money in the early stages of the development
of society and public relations, we discover that at that time, it
was mainly natural commodity money that was in demand: 1. kauri shells (Polynesia, India); 2. øsquirrel and sable pelts, slate spindle whorls — weights used in spinning95 (Ancient Russia); 3. bricks of natural salt (Ethiopia)96 4. iron hoes (Sudan)97 5. beaded belts — wampums (South American Indians); 6. bottles of vodka and tins of stew — in remote regions of Russia during
so-called developed socialism (1970–1980s); 7. copper and bronze (Ancient Rome); 8. iron (Sparta)98 Among nomads, cattle played the role of money; among landowners,
cultivated vegetable crops; among hunters, animal pelts.99 In Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece, wealth was measured by the
number of cattle, and herds were driven to market with which to pay
for anticipated purchases. Homer judged the worth of Achilles’ shield
and armour in oxen: in Latin, the word pecunia (money) is derived from
the word pecus (herd). It is interesting that the Latin root of the word
«capital» comes from capital, meaning cattle. In Russian, exchangeable
counterparts were called kuna — from the skin of the marten (kunitsa). Pelts of valuable furry animals fulfilled the function of «fur» money.
The units of value of these goods that were equivalent to money were
«kuna» (marten pelts) and bela (squirrel (belka) pelts). In a Smolensk
document dating from 1150, a fox pelt was valued at 12 kuna. Various
kinds of levies (yasak) were paid into public coffers in leather pelts. Pelts
were a common form of money for ancient states — Sparta, Rome,
Carthage. Chronicles of Scandinavian peoples recount how on land
where animals were to be found in abundance, pelts were used as money,
to pay for purchases and to pay taxes and fines. In the code of laws
of the time, it was stated that for an insult, the offender must pay one
fox pelt, for physical mutilation a sable pelt, and so on. […] «Fur» and
«leather» money were still in circulation during the reign of Peter the
Great. And until very recently, pelts were used as money in Alaska. When metal money was first used in Ancient Russia it was called
«kuna» (the price of a marten pelt) or «bela» (the price of a squirrel
pelt), and only with the passage of time did these old names gradually
die out»100 Also, rice was used in Japan, tea in China, cotton cloths in Africa
and dried fish in Iceland. For example, prices in Iceland in the 15th
century were as follows: Natural money, being of material value itself, was most suitable in
the role of money at this time, when commodity production was as yet
insufficiently developed and had not become the basic form of public
production. The necessity of using natural money was the result of the
disunity, the insulation of individual goods manufacturers, for whom
only the exchange of products acted as a way to connect economically
and socially, confirming the utility of their product and compensating
the owners of the goods for the value of that product in the form of
equivalent material valuables»". 101 It is worth noting that society, during severe economic crises and
upsets, losing faith in the possibility of other, higher forms fulfilling the
function of money, lowers itself to this form of commodity circulation,
bashfully calling it barter. For example, in Russia at the end of 1991, during a period of economic
reforms, the deficit in goods became so severe that money ceased
to be of any use — all trade began to take place on the basis of barter.
And there and then, «monetary» commodities appeared (automobiles,
timber, steel, petrol, meat), in exchange for which you could receive
anything you needed. For example, for a tonne of petrol you could get
4.2 tonnes of cement, 70kg of meat, or 1100 red bricks. Some economists call this the commodity-accounting phase. This is how Professor N. G. Mankiw of Harvard University describes
the situation in his book, «The Principles of Economics»: Circulation Natural money, having served individual and small wholesale irregular
turnover, circulates in accordance with the simplest property
rules: whoever has the article in his hands is the owner. The simple
transfer of the article from the hands of one to another constituted the
simplest exchange. As a rule, no contractual relations encroached upon
the exchange. As the variety of goods on the market increased, the problem experienced
by vendors and purchasers of determining the dominant commodity
in circulation became ever more pressing. In an evolutionary process, metal began to force other goods out of
circulation because it had the greatest capacity to be used in the economy
not only as an instrument of circulation but also (after treatment)
as tools of labour or weapons: a plough, pitcher, knife, sword, shield or
other, similar goods could be transformed more easily than other commodities
into no less valuable items, which meant that exchange value
could be converted into consumer value almost immediately after the
exchange process. |
Copying information from this website is only allowed under condition of referring to this web link.
Copyright © 2008 Andrey Gribov
All rights reserved